NOMINA CIRCUMSCRIBENTIA INSECTORUM |
||
Typified names: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z |
Diplopoda Blainville in Gervais 1844
NOMEN: Diplopoda Blainville in Gervais 1844: 59 [M.P.Gervais. Etudes sur les Myriapodes. – Ann. Sci. Natur., ser.3, 1844, T.2: 51-80, Pl.5] |
||
ORIGINAL SPELLING (Gervais 1844): Des Diplopodes (in French) |
||
SUBSEQUENT SPELLING (Gerstaecker 1863): Diplopoda (in Latin) |
||
ORIGINAL LISTED MEMBERSHIP (Gervais 1844): Pollyxenidae + Glomeridae + Polydesmidae + Iulidae + Polyzonidae |
||
SENIOR
CIRCUMSCRIPTIONAL SYNONYMS: JUNIOR
CIRCUMSCRIPTIONAL
SYNONYM:
= Diplopodea Pearce 1936 |
||
NON-MONOSEMANTIC
CIRCUMSCRIPTIONAL SYNONYM (including Pauropoda – see COMMENT): |
||
TYPIFIED NAME IN BASIC FORMAT: Julus/fg (incl. Polyxenus) TYPIFIED NAMES IN USE: - |
||
MODERN
STATUS:
the valid (while far not the oldest!) name of a generally accepted, holophyletic taxon.
Classifications of Diplopoda:
|
||
COMMENTS. At the present time, the name Diplopoda is generally accepted, in spite of the fact that its synonym Chilognatha is much older and was widely used. Strictly speaking, the both names are non-monosemantic ones, because when they were published for the first time, the nearest taxon Pauropoda was unknown. In the paper by Lubbock (1868), in which the taxon Pauropoda is reported for the first time, the name Diplopoda was used for a taxon which did not include Pauropoda, and in such narrow sense the name Diplopoda is generally accepted. However, some authors (Kenyon 1895) used the name Diplopoda in wide sense, i.e. for the taxon which includes Pauropoda. |