International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS
Em
emarginata Fabricius 1793 [originally in Cymothoa], Entomol. syst., 2: 508 (specific name of the type species of Idotea Fabricius 1798) (Crustacea, Isopoda). Opinion 643
Emarginuligenus [Renier] [1807], [Tav. serv. Class. Conn. Anim.]: Tav. VIII (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 427
Embletonia Alder & Hancock 1851, Mon. brit. nud. Moll. (5): fam. 3, genus 14 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Pterochilus pulcher Alder & Hancock 1844, Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., 14: 329) (Gastropoda). Opinion 782
Embolacarus Sellnick 1919 (Acari). ICZN 2018: Opinion 2419
Emerita Gronovius 1764 Zoophylac. gronov. (2): 234 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 643
Emerita Meuschen 1778 Mus. gronov.: 87 (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 643
Emerita Meuschen 1781 Index Zoophylac. gronov.: (9) (included in a work rejected for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 643
Emerita Scopoli 1777, Introd. Hist. nat.: 405 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent monotypy: Cancer emeritus Linnaeus 1767, Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 1055, as interpreted by the lectotype designated by Holthuis 1960 (Bull. zool. Nomencl., 17: 182)) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 643
emeritus Linnaeus 1767 [originally in Cancer], Systema Naturae, Ed. 12, vol. 1, part 2, p. 1055, as interpreted by the lectotype designated by Holthuis 1960 (Bull. zool. Nomencl., 17: 182) (specific name of the type species of Emerita Scopoli 1777) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 643
Emesis [Illiger] 1807, Allgem. Lit. Ztg., Halle (Jena), 1807 (No. 2): 1180 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of both the Principle of Priority and the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 232
Emesis Fabricius 1807, Mag. f. Insektenk. (Illiger), 6: 287 (conserved under the plenary power) (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Westwood [1851] (in Doubleday, Gen. diurn. Lep. (2): 421, 446): Hesperia ovidius Fabricius 1793, Entomol. syst., 3(1): 320, valid name: Papilio cereus Linnaeus 1767) (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 232
emolus Godart [1824] [originally in Polyommatus], in Latreille & Godart, Encyclopédie Méthodique, vol. 9(2), p. 656 (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Opinion 1527
Emphania Erichson 1847, Naturgeschichte der Insekten Deutschlands. 1. Abteilung. Coleoptera 3. Band, p. 695 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation under the plenary power: Heptomera metallica Blanchard 1850) (Insecta, Coleoptera). Opinion 2130
empusa Lichtenstein 1796 [originally in Phasma], Cat. Mus. Zool. Hamb., 3: 77 (specific name of the type species of Phasma Lichtenstein 1796) (Insecta, Phasmida). Opinion 641
Emydes Brongniart [1805], Essai d’une classification naturelle des reptiles ..., p. 27 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Reptilia, Testudines). Opinion 1800
Emys Duméril 1806, Zoologie analytique ou méthode naturelle de classification des animaux ..., p. 76 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Lindholm 1929, Zoologischer Anzeiger, 81: 282, footnote: Testudo lutaria Linnaeus 1758, a junior subjective synonym of Testudo orbicularis Linnaeus 1758) (Reptilia, Testudines). Opinion 1800