International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature:
OPINIONS and DIRECTIONS

taxa names:

Oe

Oebia Hübner [1825], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (23): 362 (an incorrect original spelling for Oeobia Hübner [1825]). Opinion 536  

Oecothea Haliday in Curtis 1837, A guide to an arrangement of British insects; being a catalogue of all the named species hitherto discovered in Great Britain and Ireland, Ed. 2, col. 280, ruled under the plenary power to be available from Haliday in Curtis (1837) (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by Gorodkov 1984, in Soós & Papp (Eds.), Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera, vol. 10, p. 18: Helomyza fenestralis Fallén 1820) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 1797

Oecotraustes Waagen 1869, Geogn.-Pal. Beitr., 2: 251 (as Oekotraustes), expl. pl. 20 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Munier-Chalmas 1892 (Bull. Soc. géol. France, (3)20 C.R..: clxxi): Ammonites genicularis Waagen 1869, Geogn.-Pal. Beitr., 2: 227, pl. 20, figs. 4a-c) (Cephalopoda). Opinion 324

Oedemagena Latreille 1818, Nouv. Dict. Hist. nat. (ed. 2), 23: 272 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Oestrus tarandi Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 584) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 106

Oedemagenus Berthold 1827, in Latreille, Nat. Fam. Thierr.: 507 (an unjustified emendation of Oedemagena Latreille 1818). Direction 63

Oedicnemus Temminck 1815, Manuel Ornithol.: 321 (gender: masculine) (type species, by monotypy: Oedicnemus crepitans Temminck 1815, Manuel Ornithol.: 322) for use by those who consider that the type species of this nominal genus is not congeneric with the type species of Burhinus Illiger 1811 (Aves). Opinion 67, Direction 20  

oedicnemus Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Charadrius], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 151 (Aves). Direction 20

Oediplax Rathbun 1893, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 16 (No. 933): 241 (gender: feminine) (type species, by monotypy: Oediplax granulatus Rathbun 1893, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 16 (No. 933): 242) (Crustacea, Decapoda). Opinion 85, Direction 37  

Oedipoda Latreille 1829, in Cuvier, Règne Anim. (ed. 2), 5: 188 (gender: feminine) (type species, by designation by Kirby 1910 (Syn. Cat. Orthopt., 3: 238): Gryllus caerulescens Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 432) (Insecta, Orthoptera). Opinion 149

Oedipus Berthold 1827, in Latreille, Nat. Fam. Thierr.: 441 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 631

Oedipus Dana 1852, Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 6: 17 (a junior homonym of Oedipus Berthold 1827). Opinion 470 

Oedipus Lesson 1840, Spec. Mamm.: 197 (a junior homonym of Oedipus Berthold 1827). Opinion 631

Oedipus Menge 1876, Schr. Ges. Danzig, N.F., 4(1): 482 (a junior homonym of Oedipus Berthold 1827). Opinion 631 

Oedipus Tschudi 1838, Mém. Soc. Sci. nat. Neuchâtel, 2: 28, 93 (a junior homonym of Oedipus Berthold 1827). Opinion 631 

oedipus Chevrolat 1860 [originally in Anthicus] (Coleoptera). ICZN 2016: Opinion 2377

Oegocerus Lesson 1842, Nouv. Tabl. Règne Anim., Mamm.: 179 (an incorrect subsequent spelling for Egocerus Desmarest 1822). Direction 23 

Oekotraustes Waagen 1869, Geogn.-pal. Beitr., 2: 251 (an incorrect original spelling for Oecotraustes Waagen 1869). Opinion 324

oenas Linnaeus 1758 [originally in Columba], Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 162 (specific name of the type species of Columba Linnaeus 1758) (Aves). Direction 38

Oeobia (emendation of Oebia) Hübner [1825], Verz. bekannt. Schmett. (23): 362 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy). Opinion 536

OESOPHAGOSTOMATINAE Lane 1923, in Byam & Archibald, Pract. Med. Tropics, 3: 1704 (type genus: Oesophagostomum Molin 1861) (an unjustified emendation of OESOPHAGOSTOMINAE (correction of OESOPHAGOSTOMEAE) Railliet & Henry 1909). Direction 28  

OESOPHAGOSTOMEAE Railliet & Henry 1909, C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 66(4): 169 (type genus: Oesophagostomum Molin 1861) (an incorrect original spelling for OESOPHAGOSTOMINAE Railliet & Henry 1909). Direction 28  

OESOPHAGOSTOMINAE (correction by Railliet 1915 (Rep. 10th Int. vet. Congr. (London 1914), 3: 734) of OESOPHAGOSTOMEAE) Railliet & Henry 1909, C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 66(4): 169 (type genus: Oesophagostomum Molin 1861) (Nematoda). Direction 28 

Oesophagostomum Molin 1861, Mem. Ist. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti, 9: 435, 443 (gender: neuter) (type species, by designation by Stiles & Hassall 1905 (Bull. U.S. Bur. Anim. Ind., 79: 124): Strongylus dentatus Rudolphi 1803, Archiv Zool. (Wiedemann), 3(2): 12, as interpreted by the descriptions and figures published by Goodey 1924 (J. Helminth., 2(1): 1-14, figs. 1-15)) (Nematoda). Opinion 340

Oestrum Houttuyn [1787], Anim. Mus. Houtt. Index: 106 (included in a work suppressed under the plenary power for nomenclatural purposes). Opinion 380 

Oestrus Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 584 (gender: masculine) (type species, by designation by Curtis 1826 (Brit. Entomol., 8: pl. 106): Oestrus ovis Linnaeus 1758, Systema Naturae, Ed. 10, vol. 1, p. 585) (Insecta, Diptera). Opinion 106